Latvia is in an economic crisis!

Mortens Hansens
22.01.2024.

Sorry for this clickbait – Latvia is not in what should be called “an economic crisis” but that is what an overwhelming majority of the population thinks, according to a recent survey, which I saw reported in LETA news on 5 January 2024. The results of the survey, reported by Luminor bank, looked like this:

Source: LETA news 5 January 2024

So, 82% think we are in an economic crisis whereas only 1% disagrees. But what does the economic data say?

Indeed, Latvia is in a recession, which is typically defined as at least two quarters in a row with negative economic growth and this is fulfilled since both the 2^nd and the 3^rd quarters of 2023 displayed negative economic growth (data for the 4^th quarter is still not available), see Figure 1.

But we are talking about very minimal declines of GDP of just around one per cent on an annual basis. We can also use the graph to expand on this by noting that the economy has seen next-to-nothing in terms of growth for the past five quarters.

But to me this not constitute a crisis.

I will even argue that a) I am quite content with this slow GDP development and b) that the negative impact on Latvia has been minimal, given the negative forces that are behind it.

Figure 1: Economic growth in Latvia, year-on-year, quarterly data, 2019 Q1 – 2023 Q3

Source: Official Statistics Portal of Latvia

Consider the latter point: Factors, that have negatively affected Latvia’s economy are a) Russia’s war in Ukraine, b) lost exports to Russia (and Belarus) – although some of these find their way to Russia anyway via Turkey or Kazakhstan, c) recession in several of our main trading partners (Estonia, Sweden, Germany, other parts of the Eurozone), d) higher interest rates due to tighter monetary policy by the ECB, high inflation (in 2021-22; not now) that eroded our purchasing power. Given this cocktail of negative factors, I actually find it quite amazing that the economy is not harder hit.

The former point; why I am not too unhappy about the slow growth/small recession, relates to the labour market. We are in a strange situation without economic growth to speak of but the labour market remains super-strong with unemployment at very low levels, see Figure 2. It is very seldom that recession goes hand in hand with a very strong labour market but that is indeed the case today. Higher growth would have required more labour; labour that is not available.

Figure 2: Unemployment rate in Latvia, 2002-I – 2023-XI

Source: Official Statistics Portal of Latvia

This is also supported by Figure 3. The number of vacant jobs in Latvia remains very high. More than 25,000 job openings cannot be filled. The labour market remains very tight indeed.

Figure 3: Number of vacant jobs in Latvia, 2008 Q1 – 2023 Q3

Source: Official Statistics Portal of Latvia

So, by all means speak of a shallow recession in the economy but to use the term “economic crisis” about the current economic situation is, in my opinion, way too dramatic.

Morten Hansen is Head of Economics Department at Stockholm School of Economics in Riga and former Vice-Chairman of the Fiscal Discipline Council of Latvia

Līdzīgi raksti

Viedoklis Vita Liberte

Latvijas biznesā šobrīd trūkst riska: kā drosmīgi soļi privātajā sektorā var mainīt Latvijas labklājību

Latvijas uzņēmējdarbības vide šobrīd atrodas kritiskā pārejas punktā. Lai arī pēdējo desmitgažu laikā esam vairākkārt pierādījuši spēju ātri mainīties, mūsu ekonomikas sniegums joprojām būtiski atpaliek no attīstītāko valstu līmeņa – gan produktivitātes, gan ienākumu, gan digitālās infrastruktūras kvalitātes ziņā. Ekonomiskās sadarbības un attīstības organizācijas jeb OECD dati rāda, ka Latvijas iekšzemes kopprodukts uz vienu iedzīvotāju ir tikai 41 indeksa punkts, salīdzinot ar vidēji 60,2 OECD valstīs. Šo plaisu nevar aizlāpīt tikai ar efektīvāku darbaspēka izmantošanu vai ieguldījumiem cilvēkresursos vien – nepieciešamas arī stratēģiskas investīcijas tehnoloģijās, digitalizācijā, datu infrastruktūrā un inovācijās.

Viedoklis Jānis Liepiņš

Sporta infrastruktūras finansējums - vai sadale ir godīga?

Latvijā sporta infrastruktūras finansējums joprojām ir centralizēts, un valsts līdzekļu ievērojamākā daļa nonāk vienā vai dažos objektos, kamēr reģionos bāzes noveco, zaudē sertifikāciju un nespēj pilnvērtīgi nodrošināt mūsdienām atbilstošus pakalpojumus.

Viedoklis Kristīne Jarinovska

Ko dos Kuldīgas likums?

Saeimas Valsts pārvaldes un pašvaldības komisija retā izbraukuma sēdē 2025. gada 28. oktobrī Kuldīgas rātsnamā apsprieda Kuldīgas vecpilsētas saglabāšanas un aizsardzības likuma projektu. Šobrīd tas 2025. gada 27. novembrī ir jau pieņemts Saeimā 1. lasījumā. Īstais brīdis apspriest un palūkoties, ko sabiedrībai dotu likums par vienas pilsētas centru. Uzreiz jāpiebilst, ka neesmu likumprojekta autore un neesmu nekā piedalījusies tā izveidē, līdz ar to lūdzu atvainot, ja turpmākā kritika vai uzslavas radušās ierobežotas informācijas apstākļos.