A closer look at the inflation experience of the past three years

  • Morten Hansen
  • 18.07.2024.
Ilustratīvs foto: pixabay.com

Ilustratīvs foto: pixabay.com

The European Central Bank’s target for inflation is 2%. Currently, May 2024, Eurozone inflation is 2.6% so a bit above target while inflation in Latvia for May 2024 had dropped to 0.1% when compared to May 2023.

But it has certainly been a bumpy ride since inflation took off and since the time it first broke the 2% barrier in Latvia before rising above 20% was May 2021, we might take stock of what has happened altogether to various prices in that three-year period, May 2021 – May 2024.

The Official Statistics Portal of Latvia provides data each month for the price developments of all goods and services, for goods and for services separately, for 12 main groups of goods and services (see Table 1) and for a long list of sub-groups (yes, you can have the price developments of pizza and quiche products, in case you are interested – just look for item 01.1.1.5), amounting to altogether 300 price developments each month.

For the 12 main groups total price changes between May 2021 and May 2024 are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Cumulated price changes May 2021 – May 2024 for the main commodity groups of the Latvian Consumer Price Index

Commodity group

Price change

May ‘21 – May ‘24

01 Food and non-alcoholic beverages42.2%
02 Alcoholic beverages and tobacco23.0%
03 Clothing and footwear12.5%
04 Housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuels46.0%
05 Furnishings, household equipment24.8%
06 Health care24.6%
07 Goods and services related to transport24.8%
08 Communication10.9%
09 Recreation and culture18.6%
10 Education19.9%
11 Restaurant and hotel services36.4%
12 Miscellaneous33.7%

Source: Official Statistics Portal of Latvia and own calculations

Nothing really surprising, just depressing: all major groups have seen price increase with the biggest increases for group 04 – energy, and group 01 – food, which I think we are all too well aware of.

What about individual products? I have put together a Top-12 for those with the biggest price increases, see Table 2.

Table 2: Cumulated price changes May 2021 – May 2024 for individual commodities of the Latvian Consumer Price Index

Commodity group

Price change

May ‘21 – May ‘24

1: 04.5.2.1 Natural gas127.3%
2: 01.1.7.4 Potatoes101.5%
3: 01.1.5.3 Olive oil97.1%
4: 01.1.8.1 Sugar78.7%
5: 11.2.0.1 Hotels, motels, inns68.3%
6: 04.5.5 Heat energy65.2%
7: 01.1.9.1 Sauces and condiments63.3%
8: 04.4.2 Refuse collection63.0%
9: 04.5.4.9 Other solid fuels58.6%
10: 01.1.1.1 Rice57.3%
11: 01.1.1.2 Flour56.4%
12: 01.1.1.3 Bread55.2%

Source: Official Statistics Portal of Latvia and own calculations

Some of these (gas, heat, fuels) are directly related to Russia’s war in Ukraine. Potatoes and olive oil can be explained by negative supply shocks, i.e. factors (= climate) causing a decline in production. I have bigger problems explaining sugar, rice, flour and bread. All four saw international prices rise following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but these prices have since fallen back. Do they remain high here just because of higher prices of transportation of such goods and/or higher labour costs and/or supply chain issues? Or have supermarkets somehow “forgotten” to scale prices back again? Worth looking into but it is beyond the scope of this little article.

Hotels, motels and inns are up, mostly because they dropped so much during corona. As for garbage collection, I have no idea.

But not strange that the inflation experience has caused such consternation across the population – most of the top-12 goods are basic necessities. Scaling back your consumption on sauces and condiments will not really save the day…

PS Hasn’t anything dropped in price during this period? As a matter of fact, yes, some three handfuls of products have seen their prices decline. Very nice with cheaper personal computers (-11.7%), cheaper books (-3.0%), cheaper cameras (-4.1%) – but it does not really compensate for the increases in energy and food prices.

Morten Hansen is Head of Economics Department at Stockholm School of Economics in Riga and former Vice-Chairman at the Fiscal Discipline Council of Latvia.

Reklāma

Līdzīgi raksti

Viedoklis Vita Liberte

Latvijas biznesā šobrīd trūkst riska: kā drosmīgi soļi privātajā sektorā var mainīt Latvijas labklājību

Latvijas uzņēmējdarbības vide šobrīd atrodas kritiskā pārejas punktā. Lai arī pēdējo desmitgažu laikā esam vairākkārt pierādījuši spēju ātri mainīties, mūsu ekonomikas sniegums joprojām būtiski atpaliek no attīstītāko valstu līmeņa – gan produktivitātes, gan ienākumu, gan digitālās infrastruktūras kvalitātes ziņā. Ekonomiskās sadarbības un attīstības organizācijas jeb OECD dati rāda, ka Latvijas iekšzemes kopprodukts uz vienu iedzīvotāju ir tikai 41 indeksa punkts, salīdzinot ar vidēji 60,2 OECD valstīs. Šo plaisu nevar aizlāpīt tikai ar efektīvāku darbaspēka izmantošanu vai ieguldījumiem cilvēkresursos vien – nepieciešamas arī stratēģiskas investīcijas tehnoloģijās, digitalizācijā, datu infrastruktūrā un inovācijās.

Viedoklis Jānis Liepiņš

Sporta infrastruktūras finansējums - vai sadale ir godīga?

Latvijā sporta infrastruktūras finansējums joprojām ir centralizēts, un valsts līdzekļu ievērojamākā daļa nonāk vienā vai dažos objektos, kamēr reģionos bāzes noveco, zaudē sertifikāciju un nespēj pilnvērtīgi nodrošināt mūsdienām atbilstošus pakalpojumus.

Viedoklis Kristīne Jarinovska

Ko dos Kuldīgas likums?

Saeimas Valsts pārvaldes un pašvaldības komisija retā izbraukuma sēdē 2025. gada 28. oktobrī Kuldīgas rātsnamā apsprieda Kuldīgas vecpilsētas saglabāšanas un aizsardzības likuma projektu. Šobrīd tas 2025. gada 27. novembrī ir jau pieņemts Saeimā 1. lasījumā. Īstais brīdis apspriest un palūkoties, ko sabiedrībai dotu likums par vienas pilsētas centru. Uzreiz jāpiebilst, ka neesmu likumprojekta autore un neesmu nekā piedalījusies tā izveidē, līdz ar to lūdzu atvainot, ja turpmākā kritika vai uzslavas radušās ierobežotas informācijas apstākļos.

Jaunākajā žurnālā