Recession versus crisis

  • Mortens Hansens
  • 20.06.2023.
Ilustratīvs attēls

Ilustratīvs attēls

During a recent Executive Education course at SSE Riga I had this interesting question: What is the difference between a recession and an economic crisis? The former is typically defined as a decrease in GDP for at least two quarters in a row – this puts Estonia and Lithuania into this category, see Figure 1. The Lithuanian economy has been contracting for the past two quarters whereas Estonia’s recession so far has lasted a year.

Latvia’s economy is still reporting growth albeit at very low rates (perhaps RailBaltica made the difference between Latvia and its two Baltic neighbours?); in 2023 Q1 the economy essentially was at a standstill.

An economic crisis does not have a similarly clear definition – this one, for instance, is not very helpful – what exactly is a “significant deterioration of the economy”???

Figure 1: Economic growth in the Baltics, annualized, 2022-Q1 – 2023-Q1

 Foto - 

Source: Eurostat

The recessions/slowdowns are pretty easy to explain: 1) High inflation has eroded purchasing power for just about everyone, 2) Higher interest rates reduce lending and lending-related activities and also dents purchasing power for those with loans, 3) general uncertainty relating to Russia’s war in Ukraine holds back some investment and 4) less trade with Russia due to sanctions

But I think very few would think of the current state of the Baltic economies as facing an economic crisis. Unemployment (I chose to show this for just Latvia, see Figure 2) is still at historically very low levels – in April the unemployment rate was 6.1% for men, its lowest level since December 2007. The rate for women, 5.4%, was marginally lower on a couple of occasions in mid-2019 and in 2022 but otherwise also at a historically very low level.

From a macroeconomic point of view, we might even argue that the current slowdown is welcome as it eases an otherwise quite hot labour market.

Figure 2: Unemployment rates for men and women, Latvia, 2002-I – 2023-IV

 Foto - 

Source: Statistics Latvia, stat.gov.lv

So, the main lesson here is the importance of a balanced economy (in terms of growth, unemployment, inflation etc.) when an economic shock happens.

2008 – 2010 was not only a time of recession, it was definitely a time of economic crisis, too. Let us be very happy that the timing of Covid-19 or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was not 2008 – 2010. That would have taken an economic crisis towards economic disaster.

Whereas these two events were seriously unwelcome, the economy was ready for them and the fallout is thus limited. Many thanks for that!

 

Morten Hansen is Head of the Economics Department at Stockholm School of Economics in Riga

Galvenais attēls no Gambelino.

Līdzīgi raksti

Viedoklis Lauris Borodovskis

Latvijai pēdējā iespēja kļūt par līderi kapitāla tirgus digitālajā transformācijā

Blokķēdes tehnoloģija vairs nav nākotne – tā ir realitāte, kas jau tagad maina pasaules finanšu arhitektūru.

Viedoklis Juris Alberts Ulmanis

310 ukraiņu karavīri izglābti un būs vēl

Laiks paveic neiedomājamas lietas. Jau trīsarpus gadus ilgstošais karš Ukrainā valsts austrumdaļā dzīvojošos tik ļoti pieradinājis pie ik dienu dzirdamajiem šāvieniem un sprādzieniem, ka tas kļuvis par ikdienas fona troksni. Cilvēki ir pielāgojuši dzīvi draudīgajiem apstākļiem un turpina ikdienas gaitas pat zinot, ka kuru katru brīdi būs jāmeklē patvērums.

Viedoklis Rasmuss Pētersons

Restorāni kā labklājības spogulis: ko tie atklāj par ekonomiku?

Lai izprastu tautsaimniecības attīstības virzību, ekonomisti visbiežāk paļaujas uz objektīviem rādītājiem – bezdarba līmeni, inflāciju un citiem ekonomikas rādītājiem. Taču ir vēl kāds, bieži vien mazāk pieminēts, bet ļoti jutīgs indikators – sabiedriskās ēdināšanas nozare. Kafejnīcas un restorāni ir kā barometrs, kas uztver ekonomikas svārstības vēl pirms tās atspoguļojas oficiālajā statistikā.

Viedoklis Ģirts Greiškalns

Ūdeņradis – Latvijas enerģētikas un mobilitātes balsts: realitāte un nākotnes virziens

Ūdeņradis nav jauna mode vai tehnoloģisks jaunums. Šī gāze ķīmiskajā rūpniecībā tiek izmantota jau vairāk nekā simt gadus. Taču šodien mēs redzam būtisku pārmaiņu – ūdeņradis no šauras rūpnieciskas nišas kļūst par enerģētikas un transporta nākotnes balstu. Pieaug pielietojumu daudzveidība, un tas, kas vakar vēl bija eksperiments, šodien jau notiek reālos apstākļos arī Latvijā.

Jaunākajā žurnālā