ANO komiteja aicina ASV noraidīt rasistu naida runas un noziegumus

36

Komentāri (36)

puika 24.08.2017. 15.41

Liela daļa konfederātu pieminekļu ir divu organizāciju sarūpēti.

Tās ir:

Sons of Confederate Veterans

United Daughters of the Confederacy

Virdžīnijas SCV nodaļa aicināja savējos nepiedalīties Šarlotesvilas pasākumā.

Te SCV paziņojums:

Sons of Confederate Veterans – Virginia Division Facebook Statement:

For Immediate Release:

Virginia Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans’ stance on recent developments in Charlottesville:

For just a moment we thought we might, for once, agree with Mayor Signer on the monument situation in his city.

We too (The Virginia Division SCV) condemn such actions as were demonstrated this past Saturday night.

Further statements by the Mayor caused the break down of any possible discussion. He spoke of intolerance and diversity. Who’s intolerance and diversity? It is the Charlottesville City Council’s lack of tolerance and diversity that has brought us to the point we are at today. They only have tolerance for their views. Where is the diversity in considering the view of anyone not agreeing with the council?

As usual the media’s coverage of this was completely biased. If they did not out right lie, they certainly twisted the truth like a pretzel.

Both CBS and the Washington Post tried to link anyone in favor of the monuments with the Alt-right group that caused Saturday nights disturbance. The Washington Post even tried to connect Republican Gubernatorial Candidate Corey Stewart with this disgusting behavior.

Of course we (the SCV) do not endorse candidates, however, we do defend anyone attacked in this way. We are not surprised when a candidate who shares our views on Heritage is attacked by the media.

The Press also attempted to link us to the Alt-right through the lawsuit that has been filed. The Virginia Division did indeed file suit. Concerned citizens of Charlottesville are also listed as co-plaintiffs on that suit. Neither the Alt-right nor any other radical group is connected with the Virginia Division SCV or any of the legal proceedings.

In 1952 an out of state Klan like group sought to link itself with the Virginia Division SCV. Then Division Commander John H. Johnson told them they would receive “cold comfort” in Virginia. Commander Johnson also called this groups actions “transgressions of decency and propriety”.

Just as we state today, Commander Johnson stated then, that no such groups should operate under the good name of the Confederate Army.

It is the duty of the Sons of Confederate Veterans to emulate the high moral standards of those who fought and died to protect their home land. We represent Southern Heritage NOT White Supremacy. People of all races, religions, and colors fought to defend their Southern homes in the War for Southern Independence.

Those who show up with torches and making inflammatory statements are in no way connected with or indorsed by the SCV. These people only serve to play right into the hands of those who would label us all as racists. In the end, they may do more to bring down monuments than the actions of our enemies.

Yes, the Virginia Division SCV has filed suit in court. Yes, we will vote for the political candidates who share our views on Heritage. That is how civilized people in a civilized society get things done.

B. Frank Earnest,

Heritage Defense Coordinator Virginia Division SCV,

Southern Patriot

+2
-1
Atbildēt

0

basta 24.08.2017. 10.27

Un melnās rasistu cūkas parādīja ANO komitejai melnu vidējo pirkstu. Kāpēc nevienu nesatrauc rasisms Haiti?

+2
-4
Atbildēt

0

Austras koks 24.08.2017. 08.40

Es ar gribēju jautāt, vai tas attiecas arī uz Antifa, Black Lives Matter un līdzīgām kreisajām organizācijām?

Tiešām vairāk izskatās kā Trampa apkarošana, jo dēļ Trampa ievēlēšanas sāk sprūst rietumu meinstrīma politiķu pēdējās desmitgadēs organizētā rietumu debilizācija.

+9
-8
Atbildēt

3

    puika > Austras koks 24.08.2017. 12.14

    Antifa utml. jau aktīvi noraida rasistu naida runas :)

    Starp citu, atradu Tavu pieminēto ziņojumu par kreisā ekstrēmimsma kraso pieaugumu ES.

    In 2016, left-wing and anarchist terrorist groups or individuals in the EU carried out 27 attacks. This was a sharp increase, compared to the number of attacks that occurred in 2015. EU Member State authori es arrested 31 people related to leftwing and anarchist terrorism in 2016, most of them in Spain.

    Teikuma iespaidu gan pabojā pievienotais grafiks.

    2012 – 18 attacks

    2013 – 24 attacks

    Tad kritums

    2014 – 13

    2015 – 13

    Un krass pieaugums

    2016 – 27

    Visi 27 gadījumi trīs valstīs Grieķija, Itālija, Spānija.

    Tur gan nav runa par Antifa, bet kaut kādām tipa Sarkanajām Brigādēm

    Te saite:

    https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/eu-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-te-sat-2017

    +5
    -2
    Atbildēt

    0

    Andrejs > Austras koks 24.08.2017. 13.13

    >puika

    Antifa ir tikai pret baltajiem, bet nepavisam ne pret melnajiem un citiem nebaltajiem rasistiskajiem ekstrēmistiem.

    +2
    -3
    Atbildēt

    0

    puika > Austras koks 24.08.2017. 14.48

    >Andrejs

    Nu ja, vajadzēja aicināt Antifa rīkoties aktīvāk :D

    Par BLM neko daudz nezinu. Cik var noprast, organizācijas oficiālā ideoloģija uz rasismu nevelk.

    Black Bloc vairāk skaita pie anarhistiem. Black Bloc gan īsti nav organizācija ar savu ideoloģiju, bet drīzāk kā dresskods aktīvākajiem demonstrētājiem/demolētājiem, lai apgrūtinātu darbu drošības iestādēm. Kā dresskodu un metodi lieto arī “labējās” grupas.

    Apzīmējumi “lābējais” un “kreisais” kaut tradicionāli, manuprāt, nav īsti korekti. Ar ko kaut kāda neo-nacionālsociālistu grupa, kuru sociālekonomiskā platforma ir kolektīvisms un vara nomenklatūras hierarhijai ir labēji? Ja nu vienīgi pieņem, ka alt-right ir sinonīms kreisajam. :)

    +2
    -1
    Atbildēt

    0

west 24.08.2017. 08.13

Rasisms ir diezgan riebīga padarīšana tā ekstremālajās formās.

Vai ANO liekēžu kompānija nosoda arī melno rasismu pret baltajiem ar tā vardarbīgajām izpausmēm ? Kaut vai mūsdienu Dienvidāfrikā un tajās pašās ASV ? Laikam jau nē. Kāpēc arī ne to ?

It kā šī parādība būtu sākusies tikai ar Trnampa kļūšanu par ASV prezidentu.Bet mērķis jau nav apkarot rasismu, bet kārtējo reizi uzķēzīt Trampam ne par ko rozā “liberāļu” uzdevumā.

+8
-8
Atbildēt

0

@

Komentāri nav iespējoti šim rakstam